Quote from engineer on January 5, 2013, 3:47 pmNice piece. H&K include some pieces that I am certain were struck with loops and all unlooped pieces I have seen show evidence of the loop having been removed. Holed pieces are even more iffy in my mind. I suspect many were struck without holes and holed later. That would mean unholed pieces are likely to be out there. It raises the question, should some of these pieces be listed?
Nice piece. H&K include some pieces that I am certain were struck with loops and all unlooped pieces I have seen show evidence of the loop having been removed. Holed pieces are even more iffy in my mind. I suspect many were struck without holes and holed later. That would mean unholed pieces are likely to be out there. It raises the question, should some of these pieces be listed?
Quote from engineer on January 6, 2013, 4:00 pmSince this piece is holed it doesn't technically meet the HK criteria but it has a nice appearance.
Since this piece is holed it doesn't technically meet the HK criteria but it has a nice appearance.
Quote from Pioneer on August 24, 2013, 3:49 pmI guess for the purest they cannot be holed or looped there must be at least one without the hole or loop for it to be considered. I think it was a way to just limit the number of pieces for the original book.
I guess for the purest they cannot be holed or looped there must be at least one without the hole or loop for it to be considered. I think it was a way to just limit the number of pieces for the original book.